Rand Paul, Supposed Defender Of Civil Liberties, Calls For Jailing People Who Attend ‘Radical Political Speeches’

By Alex Seitz-Wald on May 31, 2011 at 8:00 pm

Libertarian-leaning Sen. Rand Paul (R-KY) made headlines last week for single-handedly obstructing the renewal of the Patriot Act, calling the law an unconstitutional infringement on civil liberties. His demand to insert a series of amendments to weaken the law nearly allowed it to lapse and put the country at “risk,” but Paul said it was worth it to prevent the government from continuing to “blatantly ignor[e] the Constitution.” But when Paul went on Fox News host Sean Hannity’s radio show Friday to discuss his opposition to the national security law, he suggested implementing a far more serious infringement on civil liberties. While discussing profiling at airports, Paul called for the criminalization of speech:

PAUL: I’m not for profiling people on the color of their skin, or on their religion, but I would take into account where they’ve been traveling and perhaps, you might have to indirectly take into account whether or not they’ve been going to radical political speeches by religious leaders. It wouldn’t be that they are Islamic. But if someone is attending speeches from someone who is promoting the violent overthrow of our government, that’s really an offense that we should be going after — they should be deported or put in prison.

Listen here:

Paul’s suggestion that people be imprisoned or deported for merely attending a political speech would be a fairly egregious violation on the First Amendment, not to mention due process. What if someone attended a radical speech as a curious bystander? Should they too be thrown in prison? And who defines what is considered so “radical” that it is worth imprisonment?

But Paul’s suggestion is especially appalling coming from someone who fashions himself as a staunch defender of civil liberties. Since coming to Congress, Paul has received praise from libertarians and liberals alike for supposedly being consistent on the issue, and he often speaks of civil liberties in speeches and TV appearances.

However, aside from his admirable stance on the Patriot Act, Paul’s record shows he’s hardly the paragon of civil liberties he claims to be, but rather is “indistinguishable from the rest of the GOP on national security issues,” noted The American Prospect’s Adam Serwer last year. He’s said he will “always fight” to keep GITMO open; has said “[f]oreign terrorists do not deserve the protections of our Constitution;” and has never taken a strong public stance against torture, staying silent most recently after the killing of Osama bin Laden.

“I believe that America can successfully protect itself against potential terrorists without sacrificing civil liberties,” his website says. Apparently speech is not a civil liberty.

Advertisements
This entry was posted in Legal, Sociopolitical. Bookmark the permalink.

3 Responses to Rand Paul, Supposed Defender Of Civil Liberties, Calls For Jailing People Who Attend ‘Radical Political Speeches’

  1. My solution would be a 48-team playoff. The 12conference champions plus 4 additional teams would be given a first-round bye as you see in the NFL. Slots would be allotted by overall conference record, with individual conferences determining who would then play. In the event of a tie, a tie-breaker system such as the NFL uses would be applied. The wild card and first round would be played in late November and early December, with the “sweet sixteen” going to eight bowl games spaced around New Year”s Day The remaining teams would play off in January, perhaps using bowl stadiums ( a second bite at the apple for bowl games, so to speak) until a champion was chosen.

  2. Lacey Ghee says:

    This domain appears to recieve a great deal of visitors. How do you promote it? It offers a nice individual spin on things. I guess having something useful or substantial to say is the most important thing.

  3. Definitely imagine that that you stated. Your favorite justification appeared to be on the net the simplest factor to be mindful of. I say to you, I definitely get annoyed even as other folks consider worries that they plainly do not recognise about. You controlled to hit the nail upon the highest neatly as defined out the whole thing without having side-effects , other folks can take a signal. Will likely be back to get more. Thank you

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s